Open-source web analytics

OwlEye vs Umami

Both take a cookie-free approach. Umami offers managed cloud and self-hosted operation; OwlEye is a managed hosted product. A clear architectural difference is OwlEye's ClickHouse event pipeline versus Umami's PostgreSQL application stack.

Last reviewed:

Choose OwlEye when

OwlEye is a stronger fit when you want the analytics SDK, ingestion API, ClickHouse storage, and console designed together from the start.

Choose Umami when

Umami is useful for teams that want an established open-source analytics application with a compact tracker, PostgreSQL deployment, and built-in journeys, funnels, and retention reports.

Side-by-side comparison

AreaOwlEyeUmami
Privacy model

Uses cookie-free first-party event ingestion and excludes query strings and fragments by default.

Umami documents no cookies, no fingerprinting, no cross-site tracking, and no personal-data collection.

Deployment

Available as an OwlEye-managed hosted service.

Can be self-hosted on your infrastructure or used through Umami Cloud.

Data stores

Uses ClickHouse for analytics facts and SQLite for control-plane metadata.

The self-hosted v3 documentation specifies PostgreSQL as the supported database.

Analysis

Focuses on traffic, explicit events, performance signals, and product dashboards.

Includes core web metrics, custom events, funnels, journeys, retention, goals, UTM campaigns, cohorts, and sessions.

Developer surface

Ships a dependency-free TypeScript SDK and separate public ingestion and authenticated console APIs.

Ships a web tracker and a REST API covering authentication, websites, events, and sessions.

Migration notes

Official sources

Details about Umami were checked against the vendor documentation below on July 31, 2026.

How to use this comparison

Product capabilities and packaging can change. Use this page to compare deployment model, privacy posture, and implementation shape, then verify current alternative features and pricing in the vendor's documentation before deciding.